We heard you!

Results from the 2015 Community Survey

Last week, we invited Leadnow’s members to participate in a major survey so we could begin to understand how the community feels about the new political context, and to set campaign priorities for the new year.

Since we launched in 2011, Leadnow has been driven by our community’s priorities, and this moment, with the major shift in Canadian federal politics, is no exception. The results are now in, and we’re really excited to share what we’ve heard.

In this blog post we’ll go through the results of our member survey, and add our thoughts on what the results mean for our work together going forward. We’re interested in your thoughts too, so please leave a comment, or email us at leadnow@leadnow.ca.

Reflections on the Federal Election

q1

If there’s one thing that’s crystal clear from our survey, it’s that the Leadnow community is very happy that Stephen Harper is no longer Prime Minister. While this is hardly surprising, given that a major focus of our work over the last 4 years has been to oppose Harper’s agenda, and ultimately help defeat his government in the election, this serves as a powerful reminder of just how significant the change in government is for our community.

A clear majority of respondents are relatively happy with the overall election results (81% Agree or Strongly Agree). At the riding level things are more mixed — many people are happy, but a significant portion are not happy with their local result. This makes sense — local context varies greatly and some respondents will live in ridings where a Conservative won, or their preferred Liberal, NDP, or Green candidate was defeated.

Community opinion is split almost evenly down the middle around whether or not having another majority government is a concern.

How the new government relates to my values

q2

A large majority of the Leadnow community feels that the Trudeau Liberal government shares some of their values, and will do the right thing in some cases, but that we’ll need to work together to raise the bar in other cases (64%). One in five currently believe this new government fully shares their values, and a small portion believe they are not to be trusted to ever do the right thing.

This suggests there is an important and unique role for Leadnow to play in this new political context, by supporting the government when they’re moving in the right direction, working to improve their policies when there’s room for them to do better, and helping people to speak out and oppose them when they’re taking things in the wrong direction.

As an independent campaigning community, not aligned with any one party, Leadnow is uniquely positioned to do exactly that, putting our members’ views on the issues first.

Issue ranking in Leadnow’s three priority areas

Clean Environment

q5

In the overall rankings for Clean Environment, restoring and renewing Canada’s environmental protections for the land, water and air came out on top, with investments in a clean energy economy and a science-based climate plan close behind.

Just looking at first-choice preferences, however, we see that peoples’ top priorities are relatively evenly split between environmental protections, and science-based climate targets, with support for renewable energy close behind.

q5.2

This suggests that there remains widespread support within the Leadnow community both for restoring and improving the environmental protections gutted by Harper, as well as taking urgent action to address the climate crisis from a policy perspective, solutions-based approaches to renewables, and through opposing fossil fuel projects like pipelines, tankers, and fracking.

Prime Minister Trudeau will meet with Premiers to develop a climate plan early in 2016, and this meeting could have a huge impact on emissions targets and green energy investment. Given that both of these issues rated as high priorities for our community, we’ll work to develop a campaign to push for ambitious action in these meetings.

We’ll also watch for strategic opportunities to work to renew and restore environmental protections for the land, water and air.

Fair Economy

q6

Four issues ranked high as priorities for Fair Economy campaigning: stopping tax evasion and restoring higher taxes for the wealthy and corporations; establishing a universal basic income to end poverty, strengthening public health care, and securing a living wage.

It is fascinating to see the degree to which the idea of a universal basic income has risen in profile over the last couple of years, and that we now see that reflected as our community’s second major priority in this area.

q6.2

 

We’re in the early stages of developing Leadnow’s strategy for campaigning for a fair economy, and will use this input as a foundation for our plans. As always, we’ll also need to work closely with people who have worked on these issues for a long time as we work to craft high-impact people-powered campaigns on issues like tax evasion.

Strong Democracy

q7

Two priorities are virtually tied for first place in the Strong Democracy category: stopping risky trade deals that allow multinational corporations to sue our governments, and passing voting reform to end the first-past-the-post system. More people put Electoral Reform as their first choice.

q7.2

 

There is urgency around both of these issues. The new government pledged to change the voting system within 18 months of taking office, and Trudeau is preparing to make a decision about the Trans-Pacific-Partnership (TPP) trade deal, having promised to consult Canadians. Given the high priority placed on these issues by our community and the urgent timelines, we’re getting to work right away developing plans to roll out major campaigns on voting reform and the TPP in the new year.

Working to repeal Bill C-51 ranked third. More discussion of Bill C-51 follows in the next question.

Leadnow’s approach on the new government’s promises: Support or Oppose?

q8

 

The results in this section reinforce the general conclusion from question two: our community supports some of the Liberal government’s proposed policies, but wants improvements or a complete reversal in other cases. There is no contradiction here: as a truly independent, people-powered campaigning organization driven by people like you, we are free to follow your direction and work together to support, improve or oppose accordingly.

Our community’s position on some issues is clear-cut. For example, our community supports implementing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s recommendations, an inquiry into missing and murdered aboriginal women and welcoming Syrian refugees. At the same time, Leadnow’s members clearly want to campaign to stop the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). On other issues — such as the Liberal’s plan to amend, but not repeal,  Bill C-51 and the emerging climate plan — the largest proportion of people want us to work to improve the new government’s position. We’ll follow up with more questions for the community to make sure we understand what you want on these issues.

With Harper defeated we have a historic opportunity to achieve lasting change. Over the coming months we’ll be working to develop new ways of campaigning that build on the strengths we built in opposition to the Harper Conservatives, and at the same time reflect this new political reality where there is widespread support for many of the positive policies this new government has promised. Our campaigns will reflect that, while not hesitating to push for better outcomes where possible, and opposing things like the TPP where necessary.

Electoral Reform

q10

 

An overwhelming majority of our community is either “extremely concerned” about voting reform or “care a lot” about the issue (93%). This is much higher than the general public; a survey of Canadians conducted by Abacus Data for the Broadbent Institute recently found only 48% were “extremely concerned” or “care[d] a lot” about voting reform1.

This result, in combination with the fact that voting reform ranked as a top priority for action towards a strong democracy, confirms that working to fix our broken electoral system should be a major priority for 2016 so we can engage many more people across Canada as the new government consults on this issue to develop their position.

When asked to choose the most important criteria for a new voting system, two criteria which point to proportionality (“The system ensures that the number of seats held by a party in Parliament closely matches their actual level of support throughout the country” and “The system prevents a party that did not receive a majority of the votes from passing laws without the support of other parties”) topped the list by a significant margin.

When Abacus Data / Broadbent Institute asked people who support a change in voting system to choose the most important criteria, proportionality also scored high (although by smaller margins than in our Community Survey)1.

Based on these results, it’s clear that support for a fair, proportional voting system, where the number of seats a party gets in parliament is close to the share of the vote they receive, remains a very high priority for Leadnow’s members, on an issue we know there is widespread support for action. We’ll design our voting reform campaign accordingly, and push to replace our broken first-past-the-post system with a more proportional voting system.

 

How we work together

q12

Respondents indicated support for a wide variety of campaigns — at various levels of government, on issues, in elections, and through petitions started by Leadnow members.

When asked to express their level of interest in particular types of campaigns, a majority indicated they were “very interested” or “somewhat interested” in each option. This suggests there is general interest in a wide variety of campaigns.

However, some important differences in interest level emerged. Interest level was highest at the national level and decreased for provincial- and municipal-level campaigns. Electoral campaigning received the strongest support of all options presented.

It is likely that these results are influenced by what people have come to expect from Leadnow based on our past campaigns — for example, we’ve just wrapped up a major national election campaign, so it’s not surprising that campaigning nationally, and in elections topped the list. Support for campaigns started by individual Leadnow members, while still well above 50%, was noticeably lower than other options; this may be because we have not prioritized member-led campaigns in our work to date.

Building on these results, we’ll continue to run major national campaigns on key issues, while considering opportunities to help elect progressive candidates in future elections. And, given the overall support for a wide variety of campaigning, we’ll also consider testing more member-led petitions, and provincial- or municipal-level campaigns, especially on the issue priorities identified above.

When asked what types of actions people would like to take as part of the Leadnow campaigning community, the results showed a huge interest in participating in online campaigns (petitions, etc), with significant numbers of people also interested in amplifying messages on social media, attending local rallies and events, writing letters to the editor, donating and volunteering.

Leadnow’s campaign model relies on going wide — engaging massive numbers people through online campaigns — and going deep — engaging smaller numbers of highly-motivated people to take higher-barrier actions, such as joining local rallies or chipping in to help fund radio ad campaigns. These results suggest that our model continues to provide opportunities for engagement that align with how our membership wants to get involved.

q14

Most people surveyed are relatively happy with how many emails they get from Leadnow, and we’ll keeps things roughly as they are. It’s worth noting that the survey came at a time when we were emailing less frequently than normal, and is also (by its nature) self-selecting of the more highly engaged people in our community. At key moments we sometimes send multiple emails in a week, and email overload is something we try to avoid.

Final Thoughts

We’re grateful for the input that thousands of Leadnow community members provided to shape our campaigns in this new direction.

The top-line message is clear: our members are optimistic about the new opportunities for progressive change that are possible with the new federal government, and want Leadnow to work to hold the government accountable to important campaign promises, from implementing the recommendations of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and holding an inquiry into missing and murdered indigenous women to welcoming thousands of refugees from Syria.

On other issues — from climate policy to amending, but not repealing, bill C-51 — our community wants us to push the government to do better. And our community wants us to push hard to stop other issues, such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) investor deal.

We see part of our role as the Leadnow staff team to identify strategic opportunities when our community can have maximum leverage and impact by taking action together. Accordingly, we’ve identified three key opportunities for action on the Leadnow community’s priority issues coming up in early 2016, and we’re getting started developing major campaigns to roll out early in the new year to address issues that are both high-priority and urgent:

  • Push to replace our broken first-past-the-post election system with a more proportional system.
  • Stop the risky Trans-Pacific Partnership investor deal.
  • Push for ambitious action, including strong science-based targets and large investments in a green energy economy when Prime Minister Trudeau meets Canada’s Premiers to develop a climate plan.

As we get to work developing campaigns on these specific issues, we’ll watch for key moments of opportunity to make progress on other issues identified as priorities by our community — so we’re ready to launch hard-hitting campaigns right at the moment when our community can have the biggest impact.

When Harper was defeated, many of us breathed a sigh of relief, and we share our community’s optimism that this new political climate offers major opportunities to make lasting changes. But we also know that the new government will be under huge pressure from corporations and political insiders with a vested interest in blocking progressive change.

Because the Leadnow community is member-driven, and independent of any political party, we have an important and unique role to play in this new political context — holding the government accountable to follow through on their positive promises, pushing them to do better where they haven’t got it quite right, and standing up against them when they’ve got it wrong.

We’re excited to see what we can accomplish together.

None of Leadnow’s work would be possible with out the support of our amazing half-a-million-strong community. If you can, please chip in a few dollars to help power our work through 2016. Many hands make light work. Click here to donate today.

Sources
  1. Canadian Electoral Reform: Public Opinion on Possible Alternatives (Broadbent Institute / Abacaus Data). https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/broadbent/pages/4770/attachments/original/1448994262/Canadian_Electoral_Reform_-_Report.pdf?1448994262

 

19 thoughts on “We heard you!

  1. Dave Twigg on said:

    With a limited number of respondents to the survey (<10,000) it would appear that either fatigue has set in post-election, many are not interested in continuing political action and advocacy, or the number of LeadNow members has dropped drastically. In my case, I did not have any time last week and don't even think I participated. However, your priorities, especially considering the urgency of some of them (e.g. the TPP) as well as a commitment to work on the long-game in election reform and climate change, suggests that you have a clear sense of prioritizing and will hopefully get more members back into the game after the post-Harper euphoria has worn off. After all, a pseudo-dictatorship exists under our current parliamentary system no matter the stripes of the party holding the majority of the seats! Thanks again for all your efforts!!!
    Dave T

  2. Paul Blakey on said:

    The only problem with your survey was that it missed out an extremely important topic – the legalization of cannabis. Until Leadnow starts a conversation on this topic I will be unable to support you on any other campaigns.

  3. Dorothy Smith on said:

    Proportional representation is absolutely necessary, but is also a minefield of potential mistakes. The single transferable vote being one such minefield. Leadnow will find it difficult to ascertain the Canadian public’s true opinion until public education has taken place. Party list PR sounds great until you come to really small parties and/or to independent candidates. So what alternatives are there ? And how can the general public be apprised of them ?

  4. Ray Duriez on said:

    As a senior on a small one income pension my main concern is survival, we cannot make ends meet from month to month, if the Liberals cut out income splitting, we are doomed, all the issues you talked about above are of no interest to me.
    How can seniors possibly survive if the cost of living continues to go up every month.

    Ray Duriez
    Orleans, ON

  5. Chris Thompson on said:

    I felt the question on C-51 was not clear. I believe most members would have voted to repeal rather than improve the bill if the question was more clear. I would like to see that question asked again. If Canadians knew more about our government surveillance as with CSIS surveilling EcoJustice for example, most Canadians would want to see the bill abolished.
    Sincerely,
    Chris Thompson

  6. Laurena Brown on said:

    Thank you for doing this survey and all your hard and dedicated conscionable work. I am only disappointed that more people are not aware of the climate impact of eating animals. Eating animals is not sustainable. Have a look at the documentary “Cowspiracy” for assessing the scientific data. I watched and it impacted me enough to make major effort at eating no animals or animal products. I am a new vegan eater and that is my biggest personal sacrifice for the well being of the humans, the animals, and the planet. I was surprised that only 9 % of us were aware of the sustainability of continuing to eat and torture our mute brothers .

    • Mary MacKinnon on said:

      Yes Nancy it is under “approach on new governments promises” and it received the highest support rating from the Lead Now community which is great.

  7. Patricia Sautner on said:

    I have completed a lot of surveys in my life and have to say this one had the best framed questions, very thoughtful and to the point. Very impressed.

  8. Marilyn McClelland on said:

    In the STRONG DEMOCRACY question, if the vote numbers are correct you had the first two transposed. While close the TPP had the larger number while Electoral Reform came second. The wheel had them the wrong way round.

    An interesting survey though and interesting results.
    Thank you.

  9. Margaret Pykalo on said:

    There are two more issues at the very top of my priorities:

    1) join COMER and Rocco Galati in their fight to force a restoration of the Bank of Canada to its mandated purposes. In essence, he wants the Bank of Canada to provide interest-free loans to the federal, provincial, and municipal governments, as provided for in the Bank of Canada Act.

    This money would be used to finance public expenditures whenever there is a budgetary deficit. Apparently, the federal government used to borrow interest-free (to at least some extent) from the Bank of Canada up until 1974. At present, governments borrow all of the necessary money (apart from any bonds they may sell to the public) from private banks at the going rate of interest. Canadians are economically burdened with the resultant debt-servicing charges because the Bank of Canada does not make use of its prerogatives in the interests of the Canadian public.

    2) Pharmacare, as proposed by the NDP. The most necessary drugs would be provided for free which would then relieve the healthcare system and apparently even save $8-11B (billion).

    These two matters are extremely important to improve our lives in Canada. The banks pay zero on savings which hurts the seniors, who have saved all their lives, the most. At the same time their charges are exorbitant and obscene. We, the citizens, need help from our government. Not everything should be paid with our taxpayers’ money.

  10. Cheryl Gallant on said:

    I completed your survey the other day but one thing does not sit right with me. There was a question about stop bombing but the only other choice was more boots on the ground. I feel there should be other options in the Survey not only for this question but others. What about the other option not placed in the survey that should say no I do not want this period. It haunts me that I did not want bombing so I chose more boots on the ground but I do not want that either. I think we should mind our own business and get out we are only causing more harm in the middle east. Please give us more choices. Thank you. Cheryl

    • Lois Thomson on said:

      I’m curious to know if you are the same Cheryl Gallant who is the Conservative Representative for Renfrew-Nipissing-Pembroke. If so, your comments about the survey indicate you would like complete withdrawal of Canadian Forces in Syria, which is contrary to the written statements of Interim Leader Rona Ambrose, who wants increased involvement in Syria. Excerpt from a CBC article: Interim Conservative Party leader Rona Ambrose called Canada’s withdrawal from the bombing mission against ISIS a “shameful step backward.”

      “Today, in his first major foreign policy decision, the prime minister has shown that Canada is not ‘back.’ In fact, this prime minister is taking a shameful step backward from our proud traditions by pulling our CF-18s and Canada out of a combat role against the greatest terror threat in the world,” Ambrose said in a written statement. http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/justin-trudeau-canada-isis-fight-announcement-1.3438279

  11. Bill Archibald on said:

    Excellent work! Very informative and useful. Let’s keep the positive “work with others” approach alive in Lead Now. A poll like this strongly supports working with the Liberals and putting pressure where it is needed. We should ALSO come out with support where we agree with government initiatives. Governing is not easy so let’s be supportive on those issues that matter to us. Thanks for sharing with us all and the work you are doing.
    One thing we should also be very careful about on the “representative” voting issue. I recently read about and saw a documentary about the rise of Fascism (established in Italy first). Italy had a representative voting system following WWI. That surprised me. The extreme right gained control of the parliament not unlike Harper, with only a minority. To the extent that parties like the Green party would benefit from a representative system (and I support that!) it is also true that the Neo Nazi party benefits… something to think about.
    FINALLY, sorry for this long e-mail. ONE other issue. I think this one is critical. Would Lead Now consider adding the concentration of the media to their list of issues. We have cancelled our Vancouver Sun subscription due to the disgusting lack of objectivity and disdain for professional journalistic principles that ALL of the Post Media newspapers in Canada displayed in the last election. You cannot have a democracy when the press is controlled by any political group. The Sun system is in control of Post Media – I think someone needs to champion this issue. Would Lead Now consider adding this to their list.
    Anyway, great work, I will continue to support Lead Now with money and encouragement of your leadership. Many thanks for all you do now!

  12. Maryellen Symons on said:

    Besides changing the voting system, we need to look at the role of political parties, getting rid of the fixed election date, critically examining current election spending rules and rules about political advertising outside of elections, and restoring the powers of the Chief Electoral Officer and the independence of the election commissioner.

  13. Terry Smith on said:

    I would like to know when this survey was taken. How did you choose who participated in it? It looks like a good survey although I don’t agree with a lot of the results especially along the lines of the Syrian refugees entering Canada in the vast numbers they are going to be and the hoopla that we are going through to welcome them as well as the hopes and expectations that a lot of responders had in tying their hopes to the newly elected government. So many people actually believe that supporting anyone associated with an elected government will be any different than their predecessors. They are all initially in it for the money or soon after being elected become that way. We have no hope in Hell of ever changing this in a country such as this. I would like in on the next survey.

    • Kelly Dowdell on said:

      Hi Terry, we sent the survey out to everyone in the Leadnow community in November. People chose to participate by clicking through a link in the email and submitting their responses.

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>